October 22, 2026
Zcash developers set NU7’s mainnet activation at block 3,543,405, targeting early November for an upgrade that cuts block spacing to 25 seconds and stops spending from the legacy Sprout pool, as ZEC ended October 21 up 6.56% in ChartExchange’s daily data.
The decision fixes the point where the privacy-focused blockchain will adopt new payment and mining rules. Mainnet activation remains pending; the new development is a published schedule backed by a merged specification and a supporting Zakura pre-release.
ZEC closed the October 21 UTC session at $1,315.79, with a $1,232.60 to $1,372.91 range, according to ChartExchange’s historical table. Those figures provide market context, without establishing that the upgrade decision caused the gain.
Developer Sean Bowe’s activation proposal says the ZIP editors agreed on the height on October 20. The change was merged into the Zcash Improvement Proposals repository on October 21, moving beyond the earlier proposal-and-review stage.
Daily Crypto Briefs’ earlier NU7 testnet coverage reported that no mainnet height had been assigned. The subsequent decision gives infrastructure operators a concrete compatibility deadline and makes the previously outlined Sprout cutoff a scheduled mainnet consequence.
Zcash
ZECSource: ChartExchange, sampled completed UTC sessions, checked October 22. The unfinished October 22 session is excluded.
NU7 mainnet block replaces a provisional timetable
Zakura’s rollout dashboard lists mainnet as pending at block 3,543,405, with November 5 as the approximate date. The block height controls activation; variations in mining mean the calendar estimate can shift.
The dashboard’s active network measurements concern public testnet. Its displayed observation is a saved October 21 snapshot, explicitly labeled as such when live verification is unavailable. Neither an advancing testnet nor its measured intervals prove that mainnet has switched rules.
The v1.7.0-rc2 release notes show Zakura has incorporated the mainnet height. GitHub labels the build a pre-release. That establishes implementation progress, rather than universal readiness across node software, wallets and exchanges.
The distinction matters for operators comparing version numbers. A release that supports NU7 on testnet does not necessarily contain the final mainnet schedule. Each operator needs to verify the relevant network and activation constants in its chosen software.
The deployment specification also waives the usual requirement that activation come after unsupported software’s deprecation height, alongside the recommended three-month release lead time. Old nodes may remain running on a pre-NU7 branch, making a running process insufficient evidence of compatibility.
Sprout spending stops at the NU7 cutoff
The most direct balance consequence concerns Sprout, Zcash’s oldest shielded pool. ZIP 2003 explains that Sprout transfers require version 4 transactions, which become invalid from NU7 onward.
Funds left there will therefore become unspendable under the new consensus rules. The specification does not characterize them as stolen or permanently destroyed. It leaves a theoretical possibility of a future recovery facility, while warning that spending may never be re-enabled.
For holders, that makes the period before activation the relevant window to resolve old Sprout balances. Recovery can already be difficult: ZIP 2003 says zcashd’s deprecation removed the only maintained software that had provided Sprout wallet functionality.
The restriction also reaches beyond Sprout. Version 4 transactions containing only transparent or Sapling transfers will be rejected too. Wallets and transaction services must construct supported formats, including when handling saved or offline-signed transactions intended for later submission.
This is a transaction-compatibility change, not a universal requirement to exchange ZEC for a replacement token. Modern balances and older Sprout funds face different operational questions, so provider guidance needs to identify the actual wallet and transaction path affected.
The specification also notes a privacy tradeoff when leaving Sprout: transferred amounts change publicly visible pool balances, and timing can aid correlation. A compressed exit window is therefore more than a software-support issue for users of the older privacy system.
25-second blocks change payments and mining fees
ZIP 218 reduces target spacing from 75 seconds to 25 seconds. A service retaining a three-confirmation requirement would have a target wait near 75 seconds instead of 225, before processing delays. Those are illustrative averages, not guaranteed settlement times.
Exchanges can revise confirmation requirements, and applications have their own processing delays. Faster blocks alone do not establish a threefold improvement in every deposit or checkout experience. Services will need to communicate their actual policies around activation.
The scheduled subsidy per block falls to approximately one-third, offsetting the increased block frequency. NU7 retains the halving-based issuance structure; it does not triple daily scheduled issuance. Rounding also leaves eventual issuance slightly below the existing cap.
ZIP 235’s fee rule allocates 40% of aggregate transaction fees to miners and removes 60% from circulation for the Network Sustainability Mechanism. The removed share is intended for later algorithmic reissuance, rather than a permanent burn or a discretionary treasury payout.
The NSM specification places mainnet reissuance at block 8,939,664, well after NU7 activation. Its balance is public consensus state, not a wallet whose manager can distribute funds at will. Collection and eventual reissuance are separate events.
These changes are also separate from the proposed quantum-privacy protection for Zcash swaps. A scheduled consensus upgrade does not establish deployment of that distinct wallet design.
Alternative.me’s Fear & Greed Index showed 68 on October 22, up from 63, with both readings in Greed. The broader-market gauge does not measure NU7 readiness.
Fear & Greed Index
October 22, 2026Source: Alternative.me, checked October 22.
As of October 22 at 00:07 UTC, the reviewed dashboard still marked mainnet pending. The next checkpoints are compatible production releases, wallet and exchange service notices, and the chain reaching block 3,543,405. A complete cross-provider readiness assessment was not available in the reviewed sources.
Stay up to date
Get the latest crypto insights delivered to your inbox
Primary sources and further reading
| Source | Title |
|---|---|
| | Zcash: merged NU7 mainnet activation decision |
| | ZIP 259: NU7 deployment and mainnet activation constants |
| | Zakura: NU7 rollout dashboard |
| | Zakura: v1.7.0-rc2 release notes |
| | ZIP 2003: version 4 and Sprout spending restrictions |
| | ZIP 218: 25-second block target spacing |
| | ZIP 235: transaction fee allocation |
| | ZIP 237: Network Sustainability Mechanism |
Fact-checked by: Daily Crypto Briefs Fact-Check Desk
Related Articles
Frequently Asked Questions
When will Zcash NU7 activate on mainnet?
The published activation height is block 3,543,405. Zakura's dashboard estimates November 5, 2026, but block production determines the actual time. Mainnet activation was still pending when checked.
What happens to Sprout funds after NU7?
NU7 rejects version 4 transactions, the only format supporting Sprout transfers. Funds remaining in Sprout become unspendable under those rules. ZIP 2003 leaves a theoretical future recovery option open but provides no guarantee.
Does every Zcash holder need to move ZEC before NU7?
No universal token migration is announced. The balance cutoff concerns Sprout, while all wallets and transaction services must stop producing version 4 transactions. Users should check their provider's upgrade guidance.
Will Zcash deposits become three times faster?
The target interval between blocks falls from 75 to 25 seconds. Exchange crediting also depends on confirmation requirements and processing, so the protocol change does not guarantee a threefold improvement for every service.
Will NU7 triple ZEC issuance or permanently burn fees?
No. The scheduled subsidy per block falls to about one-third to offset faster blocks. Sixty percent of fees leave circulation for later algorithmic reissuance through the Network Sustainability Mechanism, rather than permanent destruction.



